CoreWeave vs Gcore
GPU specialist against general-purpose cloud, priced against each other on the 3 GPUs both of them rent. Published per-GPU on-demand rates as each provider last stated them, with what their own pages say about billing, commitment and egress beside the numbers.
Gcore is cheaper on 3 of the 3 cards both of them rent, by a median of 51%.
- How they sell
- GPU specialist An operator whose whole business is renting these cards.
- GPU models
- 10 40 offers
- Registered in
- 🇺🇸 United States
- How they sell
- General-purpose cloud A hosting company where GPUs sit beside the VPS products, on the same account and billing.
- GPU models
- 6 9 offers
- Registered in
- 🇱🇺 Luxembourg
These are not the same product. A GPU specialist and a general-purpose cloud differ in who your counterparty is, which is why the rates below can be far apart without either being wrong. The prices are comparable; what stands behind them is not.
The 3 cards both of them rent, cheapest published per-GPU on-demand rate each. Dearest first.
| GPU | CoreWeave | Gcore | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 SXM5 141GB | $6.31/hr | ≈$3.11/hr | 51% cheaper on Gcore |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB | $6.16/hr | ≈$2.58/hr | 58% cheaper on Gcore |
| NVIDIA L40S 48GB | $2.25/hr | ≈$1.23/hr | 45% cheaper on Gcore |
Per GPU per hour, on-demand list prices as each provider last published them. Rates exclude tax and vary by region; a cheaper rate is not the same machine, the same network or the same support.
| CoreWeave | Gcore | |
|---|---|---|
| Billing granularityOn short jobs this outweighs the rate: an hour minimum on a 90-second run costs more than a 30% dearer per-second rate. | Hourly usage, invoiced monthly in arrears | Hourly (GPU); per minute (inference) |
| Minimum commitment | not stated | None on pay-as-you-go; subscription terms billed in full |
| Payment model | Invoice on receipt; reserved and bulk credits per order form | Postpaid invoice by default; prepaid credits for some products; subscriptions |
| Free credits | not stated | Free trial periods offered; startup program |
| Egress | not stated | Free |
| Uptime SLA | 99.9% across regions, 99% single region | not stated |
| Regions | US and European data centres; General and Dedicated Access regions | 50+ cloud locations; 33 named on the cloud price list |
Neither site tells you whether your data trains their models, how fast support answers, whether a commitment auto-renews or how long you have to dispute a bill. We looked on both and record the absence rather than filling it in — if you need any of it, ask before you commit.
- NVIDIA L40 48GB$1.25/hr
- NVIDIA A100 80GB$2.70/hr
- NVIDIA GH200 96GB$6.50/hr
- NVIDIA B200 SXM6 180GB$8.60/hr
- NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 192GB$10.50/hr
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80GB≈$1.45/hr
- NVIDIA B300 SXM6 288GB≈$6.83/hr
Is CoreWeave cheaper than Gcore?
Gcore is cheaper on 3 of the 3 cards both of them rent, by a median of 51%.
Which GPUs do CoreWeave and Gcore both rent?
NVIDIA H200 SXM5 141GB, NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB, NVIDIA L40S 48GB — 3 in total, on published per-GPU on-demand rates.
What is the cheapest GPU at CoreWeave and at Gcore?
Of the cards both rent, CoreWeave starts at $2.25 per GPU-hour and Gcore at $1.23.
Are CoreWeave and Gcore the same kind of provider?
No. CoreWeave is a GPU specialist — an operator whose whole business is renting these cards. Gcore is a general-purpose cloud — a hosting company where GPUs sit beside the VPS products, on the same account and billing. The rates are comparable; what stands behind them is not.