vsH

GPU.ai vs HyperAI

Two GPU specialist providers, priced against each other on the 3 GPUs both of them rent. Published per-GPU on-demand rates as each provider last stated them, with what their own pages say about billing, commitment and egress beside the numbers.

HyperAI is cheaper on 3 of the 3 cards both of them rent, by a median of 53%.

The 3 cards both of them rent, cheapest published per-GPU on-demand rate each. Dearest first.

Per GPU per hour, on-demand list prices as each provider last published them. Rates exclude tax and vary by region; a cheaper rate is not the same machine, the same network or the same support.

Neither site tells you whether your data trains their models, an uptime SLA, whether you get credits when it breaks or what egress costs. We looked on both and record the absence rather than filling it in — if you need any of it, ask before you commit.

• GPU.ai vs RunPod Secure Cloud13 shared GPUs
• GPU.ai vs Vast.ai11 shared GPUs
• GPU.ai vs Massed Compute9 shared GPUs
• GPU.ai vs Spheron7 shared GPUs
• GPU.ai vs Verda7 shared GPUs
• GPU.ai vs Hyperstack6 shared GPUs
• CoreWeave vs GPU.ai5 shared GPUs
• Geodd vs GPU.ai4 shared GPUs